Skip to content

Divergence on Article 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (2009)

December 28, 2016

Tecle para download free deste Parecer em arquivo PDF

divergence-on-article-21-of-the-universal-declaration-of-human-rights

SSF/RIO Fórum de Sociologia

Sociólogos sem Fronteiras - Rio de Janeiro
Declared divergence in the Spanish version for Article 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Tecle para download free deste Parecer em arquivo PDF
Divergence-on-Article-21-of

(I) – There is a very clear discrepancy in item 3. It is perceptible that the Spanish version fragment is intercalated. The formula “…equivalent free voting procedures” ipisis literis mentions “… equivalentes procedimientos de votación libre” and not “…otro procedimiento equivalente que garantice la libertad del voto”.

(II) – The original formula “…equivalent free voting procedures” [“… equivalentes procedimientos de votación libre”] considers as its object the act of voting in all its implications and predetermines the voting process protected against all threats to the elector-voter. Together with the proposal of (a) preserving the vote capability/ideal and protecting the choice against any constraint…

View original post 766 more words

Advertisements

From → Uncategorized

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: